It

Tags

2010's, Andy Muschietti, Bill Skarsgård, Chosen Jacobs, Finn Wolfhard, Horror, It, Jack Dylan Grazer, Jaeden Lieberher, Jeremy Ray Taylor, Sophia Lillis, Stephen King, Wyatt Oleff

Director

Andy Muschietti

Starring

• Bill Skarsgård as Pennywise
• Jaeden Lieberher as Bill Denbrough
• Sophia Lillis as Beverly Marsh
• Finn Wolfhard as Richie Tozier
• Jeremy Ray Taylor as Ben Hanscom
• Jack Dylan Grazer as Eddie Kaspbrak
• Wyatt Oleff as Stan Uris
• Chosen Jacobs as Mike Hanlon

A very successful adaptation of the Stephen King classic, It has great development in characters alongside the horror that makes it both a coming of age tale and a creepy horror.

It’s the 80’s and in the town of Derry, Maine, everyone is shocked when youngster Georgie is taken and presumably killed by an unknown evil. His brother Bill feels guilty about it as he was too sick to go out and play with his brother the day of the horrible event. Bill finds some comfort in his group of friends; loudmouth Richie, quiet, skeptical Stan and hypochondriac Eddie, who are all outcasts in a way. Summer vacation begins and Bill is still refusing to believe that his brother is dead. But as summer continues, soon something sinister takes hold and begins tormenting him and his friends. Add to this that numerous children are going missing much in the way that Georgie did and the gang are spearheaded into investigation. Around this time, Beverly Marsh( who is derided by others for alleged promiscuity, but in actual fact is being abused by her father), becomes part of the group . The group is later joined by two other lost souls in the form of loner Ben and orphaned Mike. They become known as The Losers Club. All of them are plagued by terrifying visions; making them vow to unearth what it is that causes these terrifying occurrences. Along with this, each has a variety of issues of a personal nature to deal with on a daily basis. What they discover is that the thing that took Georgie is in fact a manifestation of fear, that often takes the form of an evil clown called Pennywise. It feeds on fear every twenty-seven years and it’s targets are children. It’s all a matter of if these seven kids can defeat such evil before it’s too late.

Andy Muschietti is an accomplished director and his effective and sturdy direction that gets to the heart of the battle to overcome evil and fear is one that truly captures the imagination. He makes the film a fun but frightening ride that has the time to invest you with the people populating it and can be emotionally in tune too. From the start, this manages to carve out its own triumph and stand out . It was previously adapted as a mini series that is held in high regard and at first I wasn’t sure whether this would work. But happily, it does work and marks itself as something excellent and different. Whereas the series had two timelines, this version sticks to a setting of the 80’s. The era proves very effective as a certain level of nostalgia is very apparent thanks to many pop culture references and the visuals. With strange angles and fine lighting, there’s a genuine atmosphere to It right from the start. The visual side is a major string in the bow of an impressive film and one I highly enjoyed. Quite a lot of scenes really stand out, particularly the ones of the fear inducing variety, such as Beverly being assaulted by stands of hair down the plug hole, an intense confrontation with the creature and a sensational finale in the sewer where battle commences. Crucially, It is just as much a coming of age story as it is one of horror. The kids all have their own issues to deal with along the way. From controlling mothers to abusive fathers and being an orphan, these tribulations can often be just as frightening as the approaching evil. I appreciated this approach that deepened the pre-adolescent characters and had me rooting for them. Which isn’t to say the horror moments aren’t effective, quite the opposite in fact. It all builds gradually, showing us Pennywise and other visions at first slowly and then with great momentum and maximum scares. And while CGI is employed, it never overshadow proceedings at all, if anything it enhances the terror at play. And Pennywise is a seriously eerie thing to behold it must be said. With a stomach churning voice and seriously terrifying appearance, he’s the stuff of nightmares. A sensational music score and sound design underline everything with creepiness and soul, largely stemming from how chilling it is and how amazingly it employs sonic trickery to unleash horror. The only niggle I have with the film is that it runs a bit too long. Other than that, I’m a massive fan.

The cast make for a fine ensemble, with the biggest impacts being made by Jaeden Lieberher as the leader of the club and Sophia Lillis portraying the only girl who captures the attention of all. But there is seriously no weak link in this talented cast of youngsters who each have a moment to shine. I really enjoyed all of their performances as they fleshed out their troubled characters brilliantly.  And of course there is Bill Skarsgård; ably stepping into Tim Curry’s shoes as the nightmarish Pennywise. He’s super disturbing and enthralling, relishing the sheer evilness of the part.

An accomplished and convincing horror, with a lot of humanity in it and characters you root, It is exemplary horror movie making with a heart.

Advertisements

A Quiet Place

Tags

2010's, A Quiet Place, Emily Blunt, Horror, John Krasinski, Millicent Simmonds, Noah Jupe, Thriller

Film Title

A Quiet Place

Director

John Krasinski

Starring

• John Krasinski as Lee Abbott
• Emily Blunt as Evelyn Abbott
• Millicent Simmonds as Regan Abbott
• Noah Jupe as Marcus Abbott

A horror thriller that taps into many fears and is ruthlessly tense throughout, A Quiet Place is terrifying and at times quite moving in how it examines people surviving in near silence from director/star John Krasinski.

The year is 2020 and blind creatures have overtaken most of the world. Despite having no sight, they hunt via hearing which is exceptionally advanced. Any significant noise can attract these beings to potential prey. The Abbott family( mother Evelyn, father Lee and three children, Regan, Marcus and Beau )are surviving the best they can in times of darkness and crippling fear. They communicate using sign language, which they know anyway because Regan is deaf. It appears that they are some of the last remaining humans given how abandoned and desolate everywhere around them is. Though they have survived for a long time, a tragic incident robs them of one of their children. When we pick up with the family again, they are living in a farmhouse and Evelyn is pregnant. As heads of the family, while terrified of day-to-day life, they are determined to protect their family by remaining as quiet as humanly possible. They have forged an existence for themselves, with many areas of the house insulated and cameras to observe outside. Lee is the main provider for them, going out to forage for food and attempting to fix Regan’s hearing aid. Evelyn is preparing for the birth of a child while raising her other two children, plus mourning the loss of one. Anxiety hangs in the air as Evelyn’s due date is approaching and the prospect of a baby terrifies all as it spells potential horror for all if they can’t remain quiet. And ever since the loss of one child, uncertainty has grown within the right family unit. But in this time of panic, can the family survive for much longer without becoming victims of the creatures?

Director and star John Krasinski crafts suspense and an uneasy atmosphere right from the beginning and keeps the nerves frazzled with efficiency. His direction is confident and skilled at scaring us and cranking up the tension as events continue. The pacing is just on the mark, building and building to a chilling and relentless last act that will have you gasping for breath with nervousness. I dare anyone to not feel panicked as the family are menaced by the scary creatures and they are separated. Sound and the ability to use it, which we can so often take for granted is crucial to this film as noises are both amplified and subdued. This gives the creepy effect of not being able to express things and the difficulties involved when we are robbed of this essential thing. Jolts of terror and As the family has to live in almost always silence, a lot of the story is told visually. We gain information from facial expressions, symbols and sign language, which gets us involved and has the attention from the start. The life these characters have crafted offers much in the way of intrigue, helping us realise just how precious sound and especially silence are in making sure you don’t become victims to the creatures that terrorise the characters. What surprises in A Quiet Place is that as well as being frightening, it has you emotionally invested too. If anything, the main theme is parental anxiety. It’s amplified here but nonetheless shines in presenting two parents doing whatever they can to shelter their brood from harm. Especially in the case of the mother being pregnant and the collective worry of what will happen when the child is born into this startling world. The creatures are fleetingly glimpsed at the start, but when revealed are truly alarming and well designed to be etched into the memory. Marco Beltrami is on score duty, ratcheting up the scares and overriding eeriness of the piece. And speaking of sound, the effects and design are sublime in dialing up creepiness and oodles of ambience. Every sound could possibly be the last for these characters so it’s imperative that noise is well used and the often deafening silence matters. Just like the characters, we become scared of sudden sound.

The relatively small cast all convince in this merciless horror film. John Krasinski and Emily Blunt, who are a married couple in real life, excel as the protective and resourceful parents. Using body language and facial expression, they get across the terror and will power of this mother and father who are doing whatever they can to ensure the safety of their children. The fact that they are married in real life adds to the closeness of the two and how they complement one another. Krasinski’s survivalist and Blunt’s warm, nurturing matriarch are fully realised and performed admirably. The two children in the film, Noah and Millicent Simmonds exceptionally convey the uncertainty and horror that’s thrust upon their young shoulders. Millicent Simmonds is especially marvellous as the daughter who is dealing with feelings of guilt and loss . The fact that Simmonds is also deaf in real life brings a lot of authenticity to her performance as well as her expressive face.

A nerve jangling exercise in tension, A Quiet Place sustains the interest and induces terror with its story and atmosphere. This is strong stuff from John Krasinski and marks him as a director to watch.

Big Little Lies

Tags

2010's, Adam Scott, Alexander Skarsgård, Big Little Lies, James Tupper, Jean-Marc Vallée, Jeffrey Nordling, Laura Dern, Nicole Kidman, Reese Witherspoon, Shailene Woodley, Zoë Kravitz

A suspenseful, occasionally darkly funny and very addictive series, Big Little Lies tackles the myth of perfection in a seemingly ideal place that unravels with a deep-seated mystery. Bolstered by superb work from the cast, primarily the ladies, Big Little lies pulls you in with its story and visuals. This review will contain some spoilers, but I promise not to ruin the big mystery.

In Monterey, California, a murder occurs. But we are not privy to who the victim is and why it ended with the taking of life. Flashing back to the start, we build a series of events within the picturesque surroundings that are dark and enigmatic. It all begins with the arrival of Jane Chapman(Shailene Woodley), a single mother  who enters the community with her son Ziggy at the beginning of the school year. She is befriended by the fierce Madeline Martha Mackenzie(Reese Witherspoon); a resident queen bee who prides herself on knowing everything and everyone. Jane also meets the elegant Celeste Wright(Nicole Kidman), a former lawyer who gave up her career to raise twin boys. All three are linked by children in the first grade and everything starts to happen on orientation day. Ziggy is accused of assaulting Amabella, the daughter of the highly strung business mum Renata(Laura Dern). This drives a wedge between people and Madeline draws a line in the sand as she’s never liked Renata and lets it be known. From that moment, things start to unravel for the women of the area. The lives of these women appear to be ideal, but scratching beneath the surface unearths another story.They all have their secrets that they attempt to keep under wraps, such as something dark in Jane’s past that she’s running away from, Madeline’s feelings that her daughter is slipping away from her( plus a past affair) and Celeste being in a volatile marriage where she is frequently abused by her husband Perry( Alexander Skarsgård )but can’t seem to leave him. With us knowing that someone is going to end up dead, things get darker and more revealing as the facade of perfection slips and the various events culminate in death for someone.

The first thing that gets your attention about Big Little Lies is the script. It’s both bitingly funny when focusing on society’s image of perfection and alternately darker in the next breath. Having the framing device of a gossiping Greek chorus of supporting characters giving their views on events provides much in the way of intrigue and humour. We go from zingers, bitching at the schoolyard, secrets hidden behind the closed doors of seeming bliss and female bonds are just some of the areas Big Little Lies goes into with its blend of wit, mystery and entertainment. From a stylistic point of view, this show is intoxicating. With the talented Jean-Marc Vallée on direction duties, it’s not surprising that Big Little Lies is such a hit. The vistas of the sea and the fabulous houses that the characters reside in provide much in the way of eye candy. And the editing and direction of the whole thing is very on point. Often, scenes blur into each other and the past bleeds with the present in unique ways that you get more accustomed to as the story gathers momentum. Montage and scenes cut to specific music abound and entice in how they connect the women and display just what’s really going on inside this bubble of supposed domestic paradise.

One of the biggest draws of Big Little Lies is how the mystery stems from the fact that we aren’t told who the murder victim is. Instead, the series flashes back to what lead to the act, excellently drip feeding us with occasional information about it. Most shows would have established who it is that was deceased, but Big Little Lies has other things on its mind to blow the big enigma straight away. Never mind whodunnit, it’s more like a who did it to who in the best possible way. And one shouldn’t forget that Big Little Lies goes to some disturbing places that put jolts into the action and are frequently shocking. Blending both humour and uncomfortable issues, it’s a show that in a sure-footed manner straddles each aspect with an eye for unearthing what sinister and pressure filled things are lurking beneath society’s obsession with paradise. And the succession of strong and rounded female characters is yet another praise worthy part of Big Little Lies. Whether lying, helping each other or trying to deal with life struggles, the vision of women is one that is excellently executed. And the last scenes of female solidarity are some of the best in the show and proudly showcase the excellence at hand here.

Reese Witherspoon heads the cast with energy as the local watcher of all things around her and someone you don’t  want to cross. Madeline as a character has a lot of layers and is not just the overprotective and domineering woman of the one-dimensional variety. Witherspoon and her natural perkiness are on show mixed with something more bitchy and flamboyant, yet tempered by hidden fears and insecurity. Nicole Kidman is riveting as the quiet and seemingly calm Celeste, whose life is so much more complicated than it seems to others. With Nicole Kidman essaying mystery and a very complex set of turmoil through nuances, you can’t help but be in awe of her talent. Her eyes are always searching for an answer to her future and are subtly but movingly expressive. Kidman’s ability to register so many emotions in a restrained manner is simply marvellous to watch as she covers such a wide array of feelings within the character of Celeste. Shailene Woodley portrays the youngest mother in Jane, who is something of an outsider in the community. She’s our vantage point into this world of mothers, children and image and one that is terrified yet determined to build a new life for herself and her son. Woodley suggests inner suffering and a deep love for her son in many excellent ways that are explored by her skill and ease in the part. Stealing a lot of scenes with intense and fierce action is Laura Dern. She stars as the pushy, overprotective and snotty mother who lauds her businesswoman acumen over everyone yet can’t cope when things don’t go her way. She manages to be both aggressive and funny within minutes of each other. Zoë Kravitz has the right free spirit and bohemian charm for the role of Bonnie; who is married to Madeline’s former husband and not exactly popular with Madeline who sees her as being too perfect.

The rest of the characters are fleshed out by an array of fine actors. Alexander Skarsgård exudes menace as a weak man whose insecurities are exposed when he beats his wife and feels like he has some power. A loathsome character, Skarsgård plays his to a tee. Adam Scott showcases his nice, average guy persona but colours it with areas of resentment that make him interesting to watch. James Tupper is childish and up for an argument playing Madeline’s former husband who can’t resist confrontation with Adam Scott’s character. And then there is the relaxed and chilled out Jeffrey Nordling, who compliments Dern’s manic behaviour with his no cares attitude. The men are great in Big Little Lies, but the show belongs to the women of the cast who turn in exemplary work.

A highly addictive series that is funny, dramatic and mystery, Big Little Lies is hard to resist, especially with a cast like this and direction this good. And if you haven’t seen it yet, here’s the opening titles to entice you.

Victoria Season 1

Tags

2010's, Adrian Schiller, Alex Jennings, Catherine Flemming, Daniela Holtz, David Oakes, Eve Myles, Ferdinand Kingsley, Jenna Coleman, Margaret Clunie, Nell Hudson, Nigel Lindsay, Paul Rhys, Peter Bowles, Rufus Sewell, Tom Hughes, Tommy Knight, Victoria, Victoria Season 1

The fabulous Maddy is doing a blogathon about the gems of the small screen and I just knew I had to take part. As I’m a sucker for historical dramas, I just knew I had to cover the first series of the elegant Victoria.

A lavish historical drama, depicting the ascension to the throne of Queen Victoria and the turbulence of her early reign, the first season of Victoria is a marvellous one that draws you in with its writing and acting.

England, 1837 and upon the death of William IV, his niece Victoria( Jenna Coleman) becomes Queen at the age of 18. She’s lead an extreme sheltered life up until this point, having grown up in Kensington Palace. Her time there has been almost that of a prisoner as her mother’s adviser Sir John Conroy(Paul Rhys) has attempted to dominate the young girl. He is an opportunistic man who has wrapped the Duchess( Catherine Flemming) around his little finger. With little in the way of guidance, Victoria is thrust into her role of Queen. While there are those who covet her position and think of her as a naive girl, with assistance and growing sense of strength, she succeeds at fulfilling her duties as monarch. There are difficulties along the way as she navigates power struggles, backbiting and doubts from courtiers and government. From this point on, she grows as a woman and ruler, destined to be remembered and revered. Still the path in front of her is a far from simple one as she takes residence in Buckingham Palace. There’s her dedication to Prime Minister Lord Melbourne(Rufus Sewell) that calls into question whether there is something improper going on. While there is some love that Victoria at one point thinks age feels( mainly one that resembles father and daughter approval), it’s a very platonic relationship between them. Her stubbornness to rearrange her ladies in waiting to make it seem she isn’t favouring one government over the other causes a scandal as well as other ways that she acts impulsively. Still trying to get a foothold into power is John Conroy, who employs dirty tactics to enable what he wants. Thankfully, Victoria manages to assert herself and banish him from her life as age gets more comfortable in her destiny. One of the biggest things is Victoria’s meeting and eventual marriage to Prince Albert(Tom Hughes). She chafes at first at the idea of wedding him as it is from the idea of her slippery uncle King Leopold of Belgium(Alex Jennings), but comes around and realises he is the man she loves. And downstairs contains just as much drama as upstairs in a highly entertaining historical series that will have you hooked.

Like most historical dramas, Victoria is a stunning feast for the eyes. The buildings and set design dazzle with colour and life, capturing the richness of palaces and country homes. Special mention must go to the costume department, who dress everyone in such finely designed clothes that you can’t take your eyes off. This is especially the case in what we see Victoria dressed in, which is nothing short of gorgeous. Just like in The Young Victoria, we are presented with a different perspective of the iconic Victoria. Here she is still very much a young woman who is alternately learning on the job and asserting her authority in the face of opposition. The writing, which covers the early years of her reign that aren’t quite as documented as the later ones, highlights the steps Victoria had to take to be seen as a strong and regal monarch. She was no ones puppet and slowly found her toughness to steel herself in a time that would bear her name. Many will say that Victoria is soapy and to an extent it is very eventful and dramatic, but that’s what makes it so compelling. There’s always something going on to keep the attention, both upstairs and downstairs. From humour and insight into palace life to the romance between Victoria and Albert, there’s no shortage of talking points here. In many aspects, Victoria resembles a mixture of Downton Abbey and Upstairs, Downstairs and is just as entertaining. It takes what made those shows great and runs with it, creating a series of fine drama and history. Not all of it may be historically accurate, but mind you what movies or television based on real events stick extremely loyally to what happened? A gloriously grand musical score backs up the pomp and ceremony of being a Queen and the romantic dramas experienced by the whole host of characters.

Jenna Coleman is an inspired choice to play the young monarch, taking her first steps as queen and learning quickly the responsibility of it. She has a playfulness and alternating will that showcases the often portrayed Victoria as full of life and passion, steel and vulnerability. Strength, girlishness and intelligence all come across in her work, twinned with sympathy for her as she adjusts to the sudden shift in her life. It’s safe to say Coleman makes for an ideal Victoria by making the role her own. There are plenty more stars in the big ensemble cast. Tom Hughes makes for a handsome and excellent Prince Albert. Our main knowledge of Albert is that his death completely devastated Victoria, so it’s nice to see a portrayal of the young man as one of many things. He’s smart yet awkward, reserved but very passionate and immensely forward-thinking. It is very good to witness more of an insight into Albert rather than just him as simply the Queen’s husband. He and Jenna Coleman share a very nice and gradually romantic chemistry that highlights the deep love that grows between Victoria and Albert. On hand for great charisma and understanding is Rufus Sewell as the skilled and supportive Lord Melbourne. Sewell plays him as a man who has been around for a long time and knows the score when it comes to the relationship between Crown and Parliament. His immense likability ensures we buy into the way he interacts with Victoria and steers her on her way to greatness.

A highly entertaining performance comes courtesy of Alex Jennings, who portrays Victoria’s uncle King Leopold of Belgium. He may be someone whose always finding ways to lurk about and influence matters to his own benefit, but damn if he doesn’t look like he’s having fun doing it. Catherine Flemming is easily influenced and distant from her daughter, hoping that it will be changed sometime in the future. David Oakes is on dashing ground as Albert’s womanizing brother Ernest, who enters into a flirtation with Harriett, Duchess of Sutherland (as played by the luscious Margaret Clunie )and close friend to the Queen. This beginning sows the seeds of more to come from these two. In roles of government, there is a disapproving Duke of Wellington and at the opposite end a slowly more respecting future Prime Minister Robert Peel. Both are played in style by Peter Bowles and Nigel Lindsay. In his short tenure in the show, Paul Rhys is appropriately slimy and scheming as John Conroy. So it is very satisfying when Victoria finally cuts him down to size and makes it possible for herself to be heard as a woman of power and influence. A lot of that is down to how well Paul Rhys plays the role that we dislike Conroy so intensely.

And the downstairs is well represented too. Daniela Holtz is endlessly severe but mainly well meaning playing the loyal Baroness. She’s often picky and constantly on the lookout for something to smooth over, but it’s often out of a desire to do well by Victoria. is a character who is both caring and staid, a balance that is well observed by Holtz. Nell Hudson is the pretty new dresser to the Queen named Skerrett, one hiding a secret and attempting to keep it fully under wraps. Eve Myles is effectively dowdy and reliable as the main ladies maid of the household who isn’t above a bit of grousing about conditions. With a flair and sense of amusement, Ferdinand Kingsley is the palace chef with an eye for Skerrett. One of my favourites characters is Penge, the Steward who is lazy and overly cynical. Portrayed by the watchable and fun Adrian Schiller displays of eye-rolling indignant and sarcastic comments add humour to the mix of things going on in Victoria. Tommy Knight plays his underling, who always has a smile on his face and impish charm to spare.

Sumptuous costume drama that effortlessly fills the Downton Abbey void in your life, Season 1 of Victoria delivers great historical drama goods with style that has me yearning for the second series.

Viceroy’s House

Tags

2010's, Gillian Anderson, Gurinder Chadha, Historical Drama, Hugh Bonneville, Huma Qureshi, Manish Dayal, Michael Gambon, Om Puri, Simon Callow, Viceroy's House

Film Title

Viceroy’s House

Director

Gurinder Chadha

Starring

• Hugh Bonneville as Lord Louis Mountbatten
• Gillian Anderson as Lady Edwina Mountbatten
• Manish Dayal as Jeet
• Huma Qureshi as Aali
• Michael Gambon as Hastings Ismay
• Simon Callow as Cyril Radcliffe
• Om Puri as Ali

A bittersweet movie that takes on the final months of British rule in India and the following Partition, Viceroy’s House greatly finds complexity and emotion in what is undoubtedly a difficult part of history to present.

The year is 1947 and Lord Louis Mountbatten has been made Viceroy of India. He, along with his wife Edwina and daughter Pamela, make their way to the Viceroy’s House in Delhi where they will live. Mountbatten is to be the last Viceroy and is charged with overseeing the handing back of India from British rule. This is going to be far from a straightforward task as political issues and opposing stances on what should happen to India. The chief thing to  consider is whether India should be independent and still one nation or the move for Partition and the creation of Pakistan. Meanwhile, downstairs a star-crossed love story is developing between newly arrived valet Jeet and the pretty Aalia. Their union is complex due to the fact that he is Hindu and she is Muslim, though Jeet wants to overcome the odds and be with her. Aalia doesn’t want to disappoint her blind father who has already got a husband in mind for her, but she finds it difficult given her feelings. Back upstairs, and although he has to remain neutral over his opinion in what will happen, with oppositions appearing in what he sees, Mountbatten edges towards the idea of Partition. Yet with violence breaking out across India from different factions things come to a head as the prospect of Partition looms large.

At the helm of this movie is director Gurinder Chadha, who manages to tackle a very touchy subject and not make everything look all rosy. Viceroy’s House is obviously personal to Gurinder Chadha, as we find out in the credits that she had relatives who survived the events following Partition. Her greatest skill is how she presents how difficult and conflicted the process of change was; it was far from easy for anyone involved in it. There’s a refreshing bluntness to her movie that takes the time of the British Raj and views it through a more critical angle than most historical dramas. There’s no real romanticising of the time, instead it discovers more darkness and machinations than that. Yes it can seem like a more exotic version of Downton Abbey in the early stages( which to be honest isn’t a bad thing at all) but Viceroy’s House has much bigger fish to fry in its running time. The movie is careful not to demonize either the side that wanted to leave and form Pakistan and those who wanted Indpendent India. That’s what makes it interesting, there is no easy or straightforward answer to it all. The love story and various parts may have benefited from some expansion as the story it takes on is big and important on a lot of levels. The romance angle drags the film down somewhat, but there’s still some small virtues to be had despite the melodramatic treatment of this chapter. But by and large, Viceroy’s House succeeds in what it sets out to do. I’ve read some quibble that the film doesn’t quite play to the facts and simplifies events( I am no expert on the topic, so can’t really judge how soundly truthful the movie is), but even so it is very gripping viewing. On a visual level, this is a movie where the words sumptuous and gorgeous come out.

Hugh Bonneville is on familiar but fine ground as Lord Mountbatten. He has a way with projecting an air of dignity and class, tempered with uncertainty about the future. Mountbatten, in this incarnation is painted as a man attempting to make things as peaceful as possible but struggling with the inevitable fall out. Supporting him is a great Gillian Anderson as his open-minded wife, the strong woman behind the man. She exudes a witty yet caring demeanor that is a breath of fresh air in a time of unrest and Anderson rises to playing the part beautifully. Despite their story being the thing that sags in Viceroy’s House, Manish Dayal and Huma Qureshi still have a nice rapport with one another. Reliable British thespians Michael Gambon and Simon Callow are on hand for great supporting roles. Om Puri, in one of his last film appearances, projects a quiet sense of worth and heart despite having suffered in his life.

A movie that is deeply felt, despite a few shortcomings, Viceroy’s House dramatises it’s events in manner that thankfully doesn’t sweeten or brighten anything for the audience. Rather, it strives and largely succeeds at discovering depth in a time in history that has been somewhat ignored on screen and presented with both effectiveness and bluntness.

Suffragette

Tags

2010's, Anne-Marie Duff, Ben Whishaw, Brendan Gleeson, Carey Mulligan, Drama, Helena Bonham Carter, Meryl Streep, Sarah Gavron, Suffragette

To celebrate 100 years of women getting the right to the vote in the UK, I decided to review the drama Suffragette.

Film Title

Suffragette

Director

Sarah Gavron

Starring

• Carey Mulligan as Maud Watts
• Helena Bonham Carter as Edith Ellyn
• Anne-Marie Duff as Violet Miller
• Brendan Gleeson as Steed
• Ben Whishaw as Sonny Watts
• Meryl Streep as Emmeline Pankhurst

A deftly done movie that blends fiction and truth, Suffragette charts the rise of the foot soldiers in the fight for women to receive the vote. Well acted and personal, it’s a movie that really strikes to the heart of the cause and what it meant for future generations.

The story begins in 1912, London. Women have for some time peacefully campaigned for the right to vote but their voices have gone unheard. We meet a working class laundress named Maud Watts. She’s had a tough life of abuse and turmoil from men , though she has some comfort at home with her husband Sonny and son George. One day, she is caught up in a demonstration by suffragettes who break all the windows in the West End. Although she doesn’t know it yet, this event and further ones will have a big impact on her. For more demonstrations and talk of women getting the vote takes place, also featuring brutality from the police and the authorities. Having been so downtrodden in her life, Maud gradually aligns herself with the local firebrand Edith Ellyn. After hearing a speech by Suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst, Maud is now fully involved with the cause. This in turn earns the scorn of those closest to her and her husband refuses to let her see their son, but these sacrifices stiffen Maud’s spine and further her desire to fight for the vote. For Maud and the women she marches with are determined to gain equality, no matter what the cost.

There’s a real urgency and immediacy to the direction of Sarah Gavron. She excellently showcases the shared strength of women and employs a camera that always seems to be moving. It captures the whirl of events and the gathering storm of demonstrations that the suffragettes take part in, from smashing windows to hunger strikes and blowing up postboxes. Abi Morgan’s script finely dramatizes the struggles of women at the time and how through actions, they were gearing up to have the same rights as men. The main story is fact-based here and is inspiring as well as important in what it depicts. Suffragette features fictional characters interspersed with real life figures in the movement, such as Emmeline Pankhurst and. The biggest message of Suffragette is how far these brave women were willing to go in order to get the vote and eventually equality. These were women from all walks of life who were united by a common goal and were prepared to go the extra mile to have their voices heard. What they went through was extraordinary and often brutal. We see women beaten, humiliated, force-fed and in the course of Suffragette. It’s not easy to watch, but that’s the idea. Women fighting for the right to vote went through a lot and this movie is a testament to them. This is an important story that needs to be told and in this very way. Alexandre Desplat is the person providing the building score that gains in momentum as events take flight and the fight begins to increase in steam and volume.

Carey Mulligan is the lead in Suffragette and boy does she deliver. She has this ability to be totally unaffected and filled with conviction without resorting to histrionics. Her face, that speaks so many volumes, is a marvel at depicting Maud’s shift from bystander to fighter and makes us feel every beat. Helena Bonham Carter shines as a leading member of the group and one of experience, while Anne-Marie Duff is fine as the forceful and agitator of the suffragettes. Then we have Brendan Gleeson as a police inspector caught in between sympathizing with the women and enforcing the law. Ben Whishaw, finding some depth and unpredictability than some parts he is given, displays both a caring attitude to his wife and then a deep coldness when he feels she has shamed him. It’s something I’m not used to seeing by Whishaw, but damn if he doesn’t do it well. Though I expected to see more of Meryl Streep as Emmeline Pankhurst, her cameo is satisfying and provides a rallying cry to Maud and a whole host of women.

An unflinching and inspiring movie that never sugar coats the brutality and resistance that was met by women campaigning for the right to vote, Suffragette has much to recommend in its reels.

Paddington

Tags

2010's, Adventure, Ben Whishaw, Comedy, Hugh Bonneville, Imelda Staunton, Jim Broadbent, Julie Walters, Madeleine Harris, Michael Gambon, Nicole Kidman, Paddington, Paul King, Peter Capaldi, Sally Hawkins, Samuel Joslin

Film Title

Paddington

Director

Paul King

Starring

• Ben Whishaw as Paddington Bear
• Hugh Bonneville as Henry Brown
• Sally Hawkins as Mary Brown
• Julie Walters as Mrs. Bird
• Nicole Kidman as Millicent
• Madeleine Harris as Judy Brown
• Samuel Joslin as Jonathan Brown
• Peter Capaldi as Mr. Curry
• Jim Broadbent as Mr. Gruber
• Michael Gambon as Uncle Pastuzo
• Imelda Staunton as Aunt Lucy

A sprightly, adventure-filled and heartwarming take on the classic stories of Michael Bond’s marmalade loving, eponymous bear, Paddington is one of those movies that it’s hard to find fault with. Primarily, this stems from the fact it’s so much fun and an utter delight of comedy, heart and wonder.

We begin in the jungles of Darkest Peru, where we discover an English explorer happening upon two very intelligent bears with a love of marmalade. In time, he teaches them about modern life and even gets them to talk. Before heading back to civilisation he promises them a home in London if they should ever need it. The two bears, named Pastuzo and Lucy, have a nephew with them many years later; a curious and fun-loving bear who shares their taste for marmalade. But their harmony is shattered when an earthquake hits and kills Uncle Pastuzo. Aunt Lucy is getting older and can’t take care of Paddington as she once could. she remembers the explorer’s words of promise about there always being a home in London. Stowing her nephew into a cargo ship, she bids him farewell in the hope he will find a happy, new home. Upon arrival in London, he is met with hostility and all hope for a lovely, caring family to take care of him seems lost. That is until he encounters the Brown Family at Paddington Station. The mother, Mary, gives him the name Paddington and being a kind, considerate person, she offers to house him in her home. Her fussy and killjoy husband Henry, who is obsessed with keeping things risk-free, is completely against the idea of Paddington living with them. The children Judy and Jonathan, are thrilled to have Paddington with them, despite their father’s trepidation. Paddington is most curious to know more about the professor who visited Darkest Peru all those years ago and roping the family into things, he gets them into a whirl of unintentional mischief and laughs. But there is an evil taxidermist by the name of Millicent who has discovered Paddington and will stop at nothing to make him part of her sinister collection, now on his tail. Cue much mayhem, thrills and adventure for the bear and the Brown Family.

Paul King directs with an enormous amount of heart, humour and deeply felt love that explodes from almost every frame. It will take someone with a real damp view of life to not smile or have fun with a movie such as this. King just pushes all the right buttons of raucous humour, heartfelt sentiment and just plain adventure in a way that is spellbinding and an utter delight throughout. sense of magic and feel good factor it has going for it. It’s adventure of the highest level that proves totally sprightly and accessible to all ages. The blending of CGI in the title character and the real-life surroundings, that are continuously colourful, is seamlessly done. On a visual level, Paddington scores major points. The bright as a button colour scheme and adventurous ways of showcasing this zany fable are here in a glorious pot of love. And speaking of love, the film truly gets across the message of accepting people and loving one another beautifully and with clarity. The humour covers a wide spectrum from the mischievous and playful(Paddington accidentally flooding the Brown’s bathroom for starters) to nods and winks to older members of the audience, without missing a beat or getting overstuffed. It’s rare to come across a film such as Paddington that can be a ball for everyone watching. It has a style and care to it that many movies that aim for every age can sometimes miss in the long run. The high-reaching and upbeat score are on full duty; bringing out the simply amazing story and film that it accompanies. Put quite simply, you couldn’t ask for a more enchanting movie than Paddington.

Ben Whishaw beautifully voices the title bear with a childlike adventure and sense of mischief. His relaxing tones and enthusiasm can be heard so well that it’s really difficult to imagine another person voicing Paddington with the same skill as Whishaw has. Hugh Bonneville and Sally Hawkins play well off one another as total opposite mum and dad. Bonneville is staid, careful and unwilling to entertain fancy notions, Hawkins is imaginative, lovely and slightly zany. Both consummate actors invest a lot into their respective roles(which also goes for pretty much the entire cast, who are finely assembled). The ever-dependable Julie Walters has a whole bundle of fun as the elderly relative of the Brown’s, whose quick wit and precision with cleaning ensures things are up to her tidy standards. Nicole Kidman is a dark delight as the villain of the piece; a Cruella like woman who wants to add Paddington to her collection. Kidman is both menacing and tongue in cheek funny, while also embodying something seductively devious too. It’s obvious that she had a really fun time playing this type of character just from the looks on her face. Child actors Madeleine Harris and Samuel Joslin are ideal for the roles of the Brown children who take the bear under their wing. Peter Capaldi is very amusing and slimy as the local nosy neighbour getting in trouble with the evil taxidermist, while Jim Broadbent provides sage as a man who helps point Paddington in the direction of what he seeks. Briefly found voicing Paddington’s relatives in Darkest Peru are Michael Gambon and Imelda Staunton, whose pathos and warmth are felt from the get go, despite only being on the screen for a short duration.

Hilarious, riotously entertaining and aimed at all ages, Paddington takes its place as a firm favourite that will pull you in with its message of family and its massive beating centre that is the lovable bear.

Letters to Juliet

Tags

2010's, Amanda Seyfried, Christopher Egan, Drama, Gael García Bernal, Gary Winick, Letters to Juliet, Romance, Vanessa Redgrave

Film Title

Letters to Juliet

Director

Gary Winick

Starring

• Amanda Seyfried as Sophie
• Vanessa Redgrave as Claire
• Christopher Egan as Charlie
• Gael García Bernal as Victor

A gorgeously scenic and romantic movie, Letters to Juliet is a somewhat slight but nonetheless lovely film about a second chance of love and the adventure of it.

Sophie is a fact checker who wants to become a serious writer, but has always put it off due to one reason or another. She has a romantic getaway before her wedding planned for her and her husband to be Victor. He is a chef whose main priority is making time for his new business venture, leaving little in the way of time spent with Sophie. They go to Verona, where Victor is overly busy with things for his restaurant. This means that Sophie explores the romantic and historical place alone. On one such day, she encounters the Secretaries of Juliet; women who answer the lovelorn letters left at the fictional heroine’s house. Helping the ladies with their tasks in an attempt to inspire her own writing, Sophie discovers a hidden letter in a crack in the wall where many leave their questions. The letter is over fifty years old and was written by Englishwoman Claire, who poured her heart out about having to leave her beloved Lorenzo behind. She believes she must right back and does so, little suspecting anything will happen as a result. Which is why she gets the shock of her life when Claire, who is now older and widowed, turns up in Verona following Sophie’s advice. Her foppish and snobby grandson Charlie is also there and immediately berates Sophie for what he says as foolish actions. Claire on the other hand is a lot more understanding and grateful to Sophie and wishes to find her Lorenzo, all of these years later. She is hoping for a second chance with her soul mate, having left her romance with him in the back of her mind. Charlie is completely reluctant to do so, but is strong-armed into it by his Grandmother and begrudgingly, Sophie. In the course of all this searching in Italy, Claire’s journey causes Sophie to examine her own relationship with her soon to be husband and how it may not be quite what she expected. Potential romance may come in the form of Charlie , but it’s chalk and cheese at first for the mismatched pair.

Gary Winick’s direction is bright and bubbly, wrapping us in a whirl of rose-tinted romance and soul-searching. He does a commendable job and plays to the audiences expectations in a way that’s reassuring as we are fully aware of the outcome. The Italian surroundings and setting are simply put magnificent. With an old-fashioned golden sheen that is irresistible to the eye, faith in love and adventure set in ideally. You can’t help but feel romantic when watching Letters to Juliet. Don’t expect big surprises from Letters to Juliet as it’s doubtful you’ll find any. But that almost adds to the virtue of the film; it doesn’t make any pretence about what it is. It’s a gorgeous, almost fairy tale like story of romance and unlikely circumstance that will get even the most cynical to crack a grin. Plus, the feeling of familiarity is very comforting as you have a great idea of the luscious content of the movie. It’s the last half of Letters to Juliet that really drags on, though the parts before it are agreeable and make up for the overly long areas. The score is acceptable enough while being nothing too mind-blowing or original, which is to say it does the job in the expected way of romantic movies.

Amanda Seyfried heads the cast with plenty of winsome appeal and loveliness. Her fresh face and sincerity can’t be faulted as they are too inviting to resist. it’s not a stretch of a role, but one Seyfried plays well nonetheless. It is Vanessa Redgrave who truly comes alive and is one of the best things in Letters to Juliet. With her simply mesmerising voice and air of class, balanced by something fun-loving, it is a fine showcase from a special actress. With just a look, you can feel her desire, longing and quiet regret so beautifully. The film simply wouldn’t be the same without her clout and dignity. Christopher Egan has the handsomeness and posh demeanor that is right for the part of Charlie, whose snotty antics are subdued by Sophie in a gradual way, while Gael García Bernal is rightly self-absorbed as Sophie’s man whose interest in his own business seems to come before her.

While wholly predictable, the gorgeousness and the fact that it’s heart is in the right places ensures that Letters to Juliet is an enjoyable and light experience.

Mother!

Tags

2010's, Brian Gleeson, Darren Aronofsky, Domhnall Gleeson, Drama, Ed Harris, Horror, Javier Bardem, Jennifer Lawrence, Kristen Wiig, Michelle Pfeiffer, Mother!

Film Title

Mother!

Director

Darren Aronofsky

Starring

• Jennifer Lawrence as Mother
• Javier Bardem as Him
• Michelle Pfeiffer as Woman
• Ed Harris as Man
• Domhnall Gleeson as Oldest Son
• Brian Gleeson as Younger Brother
• Kristen Wiig as Herald

A delirious and disturbing horror/drama movie that both enthralls and annoys, Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is the definition of a divisive movie. I remember hearing all the buzz about the movie being one of the riskiest studio releases in a long time, and I won’t argue there. But the film squarely falls into a mixed category as to its value and what it is trying to say to us.

An unnamed couple( referred to in the credits as Mother and Him) live in a large, isolated house somewhere in the country. Mother is a domestic goddess who is refurbishing the home, as we learn there was once a fire many years before that ruined the place. She is supportive of her much older husband, a poet with a severe case of writer’s block, but a lot of the time the love seems one-sided. She seems to always praise him and be there, while he isn’t the most forthcoming in approval or thanks to his wife. Their relatively tranquil existence is disturbed by a late-night knock at the door. There is an ageing doctor who says he has mistaken their house for a bed and breakfast. Mother is against letting him stay as he is a stranger, but Him is adamant that they cater to the man. The next day his wife appears and almost immediately begins to stir trouble for Mother. However, Him seems to revel in the company of these intruders, much to the annoyance and pain suffered by Mother. Gradually, everything begins spinning out of control for Mother as yet more people descend on the house and all manner of shocking events take hold, completed by Him basking in a new batch of inspiration.

Darren Aronofsky is the man behind the camera and script. He’s always been a director who knows how to shock and disturb cinema goers with his content, from Requiem for a Dream to Black Swan. I will say that Aronofsky builds up tension rather nicely with Mother! before unleashing an abundance of sheer craziness that will have you considering what you just saw. Credit where it’s due, Aronofsky crafts something extremely polarizing and material that is bound to get people talking. But there are certain areas that don’t quite add up and make the film feel bloated as a result. Aronofsky is clearly trying to say a lot of things, but at its heart, Mother! gets extremely esoteric. That’s not to say that any thematic material is gone( there is clear biblical parallels in the story and notions on inspiration), but it feels like an overload and that he is biting off more than he can chew in a good few ways. Plus, you can’t help but feel that Aronofsky is trying to be too clever and too self-indulgent with this movie. Mother! is a film that is hard to forget for sure, especially in the latter half. With the house being bombarded by intruders, everything including the kitchen sink is thrown at the viewer as all manner of hellish act is realised and put on us. Adding to this is the burnt gold of the cinematography and frequent closeness of the camera to Lawrence, exuding a claustrophobic air to everything. There is a distinct lack of a musical score here; Mother! utilises sound effects and unusual noises to bring out the eeriness of the piece in a rather successful manner.

One part of Mother! that cannot be faulted is the acting from the relatively small cast. Jennifer Lawrence ideally plays the lead, whose existence and sanity come under severe threat as the movie progresses. Starting out quiet, subtle and demure, before her mind unravels and she goes into alarming intensity and harrowing confusion, Lawrence gives the part her all and succeeds greatly with what she brings to the screen. On screen in almost every frame, Jennifer Lawrence sells the intense nature of Mother! brilliantly. Javier Bardem at his most lupine is effectively creepy and selfish as the husband whose inspiration seems to arise from the chaos surrounding him and his young wife. Michelle Pfeiffer is a wicked delight in a keen supporting part. Playing the intrusive, forthright and ever so feline woman who begins making her presence felt in Mother’s life, she’s devilishly toxic and strangely seductive to watch. Her and Ed Harris( whose enigmatic and equally as good) don’t have a lot of time on screen, but boy do they make the most of what they have! The same can be said of the Gleeson brothers who star as brawling siblings whose violence leads us into the second act of the movie. And appearing in a startling but entertaining cameo is Kristen Wiig.

Mother! as a movie is an extremely shocking experience, that is both hard to tear yourself away from and equally as repellent. I seem to fall into the middle ground of the consensus on this movie. While I will say that the direction is stylish and provocative and the acting is of a high standard, I must also bring forward that it’s a movie that often has too much going on, leading it to be hollow in the grand scheme of things. A movie that splits opinion is the best way to describe what Mother! is.

The Handmaid’s Tale Season 1

Tags

2010's, Alexis Bledel, Ann Dowd, Elisabeth Moss, Joseph Fiennes, Madeline Brewer, Max Minghella, O.T. Fagbenle, Samira Wiley, The Handmaid's Tale, The Handmaid's Tale Season 1, Yvonne Strahovski

A hauntingly engrossing, evocative and vivid rendering of Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale is compulsive television that presents many terrifying possibilities and ideas that will leave you glued to the screen but shaken. Be warned, spoilers may follow in my review of this season. Plus, I’ve just read that the show has been renewed for a second season which should be interesting.

In a future version of what was North America, the Republic of Gilead has come into power through unjust and harsh means. It rules with totalitarian authority and oppresses all, particularly women. They are divided into various ranks and treated as second class citizens by a male dominated world that uses religion to justify its regime. It is seen as a return to ‘traditional values’ by those in power, but is upheld by extreme brutality. Over the years, birth rates have plummeted and only a handful of women can bear children. Offred(Elisabeth Moss) is a Handmaid who represents the main character. She had a different name and a life before the rise of Gilead, but it is forbidden to talk about it now. She also had a husband named Luke(O.T. Fagbenle) and daughter, who we see was snatched away when they attempted to escape Gilead for the border. We hear her thoughts as she leads us through her terrifying circumstances. The main job of a Handmaid is to provide offspring for the household they are assigned too, as a sexual slave to a high-ranking official known as a Commander. The ceremony is a forceful one in which the women have no choice and are basically victims of institutionalized rape. Earlier, the handmaids are conditioned and brutalised by The Aunts, a group of women who drill into them the horrifying duty they must perform and use violence if disobeyed. Offred is stationed at house of Commander Fred Waterford(Joseph Fiennes). His wife Serena Joy(Yvonne Strahovski) , who was one of the instrumental figures in crafting Gilead, is desperate for a child and often acts in a cold manner to Offred due to her being barren. Navigating her way through this horrible existence, Offred slowly chafes at it and with the memories of her daughter and husband still with her, stiffens her backbone. For she intends to survive the hellish universe and with help from other handmaid’s who are part of a form of resistance, she may just do it. But in this tormented and oppressive world, can anyone truly escape?

Right off the bat, The Handmaid’s Tale is loaded thematic meat and backbone in the most eye-opening way.  What definitely strokes the hardest is that the events depicted don’t seem that far removed from genuine reality and can be read as highly topical too. We live in a time where the future could go either way in terms of attitudes and God knows what else, so The Handmaid’s Tale functions as something of a wake up call to many. Themes of female subjugation, physical, sexual and emotional abuse along with rebellion, dictatorship and corrupt power flow like a river in this horrifying but compulsive series. Having Offred be the guiding force of the narrative, particularly her narration, is a well employed tool for framing the show. Often, her voice is at odds with her actions due to the way that the society has forced her into submission. But crucially it places us right into her mindset and how the world is seen through her eyes. We are privy to important information that moves the story along and allows us to be witness to her growing strength and rebellion.

On the visual side, shallow focus is supremely well employed in capturing the conflict of the world and just how much it takes a toll on the much abused women. Offred is the main window into events and intense close-ups that frame her are some of the most piercing moments in this disturbing tale. Bright lighting for exterior shots is one example of a pointed irony that permeates from the series throughout. The blinding sunlight is very much the opposite of what life is like for Offred and her fellow handmaid’s and that juxtaposition is palpably terrifying and cloistered. When inside, only a shaft of light creeps into the spaces which benefits the growing hope inside Offred as well as the dire situation at hand. In fact, irony is one of the shows greatest assets as it horrifies and disturbs with how the world has fallen. From the Handmaid’s being coerced into beating a man supposedly guilty of rape to death and a ceremony of sham for visiting dignitaries, the unfairness and hypocrisy of Gilead knows just how to unnerve the audience and shock with deep intent. The low murmuring of the sinister score echoes throughout the episodes, with a definite haunting quality that is both futuristic and spooky.

Leading the cast is the exceptional Elisabeth Moss as Offred. A mixture of desperation and steely gumption colours the work, with Moss hitting the notes and beats excellently in conveying the situation of a woman trying to persevere in a world of horror. so much is displayed through her eyes- fear, determination, pathos and defiance largely due to the fact that her character is trying to survive a regime that keeps everyone oppressed and silent. Elisabeth Moss has a gift for subtlety that is nonetheless expressive and nuanced, a string in her well armed bow that strikes to the heart of Offred and explores her beautifully. It’s a remarkable piece of acting that highlights just how talented an actress Moss is as she charts a gathering storm of feeling Offred goes through. Joseph Fiennes finds a deep ambiguity in the Commander, who is one of those responsible for the rise of Gilead. He manages to be both creepy and strangely charismatic, you never quite know what to make of him as he is a layered character. Yvonne Strahovski is cruel, cold and ever so desperate behind it all as the melancholy wife of the Commander. Chinks of humanity lie behind her nasty facade of devout righteousness as she knows that she is essentially a prisoner of what she wanted, but she’s best when being vindictive and callous.

Alexis Bledel is another fine addition to the series, essaying a tragedy and alternating will. Playing a seemingly pious Handmaid who is in fact a member of resistance against government, Bledel, much like Moss and her eyes, uses her orbs to enact her varying emotions to amazing degrees. I ask anyone to not feel intense feeling when she is put through the wringer of sadness and possible hope as Bledel is so good at making a very lasting impression. Madeleine Brewer, with alarming and childlike mannerisms, gets to the core of her part, who has been ground into near madness by conditioning and trauma. She has some of the most eventful moments in the series and delivers the goods. On scene-stealing form is Ann Dowd, who makes the absolute most of her time on screen. Starring as one of the Aunts, she is severe, abusive and authoritative. But Dowd goes beyond just the temptation to make her a simple villain by unearthing that she too is somewhat brainwashed by the cause and seriously believes she is doing God’s will. Samira Wiley, with her strong face and intense demeanor, compliments Moss when she appears largely in flashback as her best friend. Her sense of attitude and sarcasm are a welcome relief in a series that is largely dark. Max Minghella is another ambiguous presence, portraying the driver to the Commander who may or may not have bad intentions. He is most explored through his tenuous relationship with Offred, that shows that he’s got some good in him yet we still don’t know whether he is trustworthy or not. O.T. Fagbenle rounds out the cast as the husband of Offred, who appears for a big chunk in flashback. He is a welcome reminder that there was once goodness within man before Gilead totally took over.

A truly disturbing yet completely compelling series that benefits from its execution, visuals and acting, The Handmaid’s Tale truly stays with you for a long time after viewing it.