Tags
1970's, Bryan Forbes, Katharine Ross, Nanette Newman, Patrick O'Neal, Paula Prentiss, Peter Masterson, The Stepford Wives, Thriller, Tina Louise
Film Title
The Stepford Wives
Director
Bryan Forbes
Starring
- Katharine Ross as Joanna Eberhart
- Paula Prentiss as Bobbie Markowe
- Peter Masterson as Walter Eberhart
- Nanette Newman as Carol van Sant
- Tina Louise as Charmaine
- Patrick O’Neal as Dale ‘Diz’ Coba
A chilling thriller that takes a satiric aim at men’s controlling desire to dominate women, conformity and perfection, The Stepford Wives is a well-directed and unusual film that engages on many levels.
Joanna Eberhart is a young wife and aspiring photographer who moves with her husband Walter and two daughters from bustling New York to the quiet suburb of Stepford, Connecticut. The place looks idyllic and nice, but something about it sets Joanna on edge. In particular, the womenfolk of the town are all well-dressed, completely submissive to their husbands and obsessed with household chores like cooking and ironing in a most unnatural way. For the nonconformist in Joanna, this alarms her as her ideas are completely at odds with the other women who seem to do anything and everything to please their spouses. Adding more to her concern about the residents and town itself is Walter joining the Men’s Association, that is incredibly secretive and headed by the menacing businessman Dale, who is more commonly referred to as Diz. Shortly after moving in, Walter begins to grow very distant and more and more involved with the Association, much to Joanna’s dismay. Thankfully, Joanna finds a friend and kindred spirit in one of the most recent residents of Stepford who isn’t a robotic housewife; the talkative and free-thinking Bobbie Markowe, who also thinks that the town and the subservient, cooking obsessed women are a little too perfect and not quite right. Working together due to their shared feelings of uneasiness, the two women investigate the mystery surrounding the seemingly lovely town and dig into how the Men’s Association is involved. They plan to expose what strange events are lurking and have turned all of the women into carbon copies of each other, before they too become just like the wives of the town. Let’s just say that events get increasingly disturbing.
In the role of director, Bryan Forbes fleshes out the creepy and scathing tale of individuality under threat and traditional gender roles. The film really structures the unusual findings and too good to be true appearance of the eponymous town to great effect. Forbes employs a measured pace that allows the creepiness to sink in and take us with it, much like the way Joanna and Bobbie feel as they delve deeper into the strange yet picturesque town. At first, The Stepford Wives lulls us into a false sense of security, then it slowly pulls the rug from under us as Joanna sees that the town is a very sinister place with unusual goings on. While The Stepford Wives is very much a thriller, it has a biting overtone of acerbic attack in the way it examines the themes of gender dominance and society’s need to have everything presentable. A bright cinematography is used throughout that counteracts the seeming idyllic nature of Stepford with the darkness the lies just below the all too perfect surface. The same can be said of the music, which begins lilting and calm before slowly giving rise to suspense and shock as Joanna fights to survive.
Katharine Ross is splendidly cast as the shocked and alarmed Joanna, who finds that she must fight to retain her individuality before it is too late. Ross has the right amount of pluck, spirit and strength for the part and she does it extremely well. Paula Prentiss is just as good as the rebellious and very helpful Bobbie, who along with Joanna is practically the only woman not affected by the strange cases of utter perfection and subservience. Peter Masterson is on edge and very shifty as Joanna’s spouse who begins to act very cold towards his wife right around the time he joins the secretive Association. Nanette Newman absolutely embodies the role of one of the drone-like women who make up the town and are constantly obsessed with pleasing their spouses with chilling preciseness. Tina Louise plays the role of one of the women who originally seems fine but is eventually doomed to become just like all the other wives after a ‘weekend vacation’. Patrick O’Neal has the necessary sliminess and menace for the role of the mysterious Diz, who seems to hold sway over many of the things in the town.
By turns disturbing and satirical, The Stepford Wives knows exactly what buttons to press to induce a creepy feeling of uneasiness and explore the themes it presents with an acidic eye.
Lloyd Marken said:
I saw the remake but I think this is the one to see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I haven’t seen the remake but somehow I don’t think it would compare to the excellence of this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lloyd Marken said:
I suspect you’re right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Vern said:
I read the book first and then I saw the remake. The book was very much a thriller(Written by the same guy who wrote Rosemary’s Baby) while the remake wanted to be a very light comedy. I was disappointed because it altered the main themes of the book. Yes the 70’s version is the best film adaptation of that book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
This version has the right amount of chills and satiric sideswipes at male domination and the desire for perfection.
LikeLike
beetleypete said:
The remake is pale by comparison. But this original was very much a thing of its time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vinnieh said:
I don’t have much interest in seeing the remake Pete.
LikeLike
beetleypete said:
I read the book in the early 70s, and saw the film on release soon after. Like some other films around that time; Soylent Green, Westworld, and The Omega Man, it was something fresh and exciting back then. from your review, I am guessing that it still holds up for a younger generation. (Avoid the remakes at all costs…)
Cheers, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I say it still holds up very well due to the thematic material and creepiness.
LikeLike
beetleypete said:
That’s good to hear mate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Good movies with a compelling story always hold up well.
LikeLike
The Telltale Mind said:
Can’t beat the original! Good review Vin!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Thanks man, I found this movie to be so riveting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
First Night Design said:
I’d forgotten Bryan Forbes directed. It’s so much better than the remake – much more disturbing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It was a disturbing movie that had some chilling and very unusual sequences.
LikeLike
By Hook Or By Book ~ Book Reviews, News, & Other Stuff said:
I HATED the remake, but I loved the original! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I have no intention to watch the remake because the original was so good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
By Hook Or By Book ~ Book Reviews, News, & Other Stuff said:
Even though it had Matthew Broderick and Nicole Kidman in it it was awful! 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I can’t imagine it living up to this one as it is so good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
By Hook Or By Book ~ Book Reviews, News, & Other Stuff said:
They tried to make a comedy of it of all things. Ugh. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Oh that sounds horrid. It is more satirical than out and out funny which is what the original accomplished well.
LikeLike
dbmoviesblog said:
I have always wanted to see this movie, thank you for the review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
And I very much hope you do get to see it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
fragglerocking said:
Agree with everyone, the original was awesome, no need for that remake, only watched 10 mins of it and gave up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
This is the superb version that really chills. From what I’ve heard the remake is pretty poor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Likkleone said:
Seen the remake but, like others, I’m suspecting the original is better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I find in so many cases that the original is always better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Likkleone said:
Every now and again you get a good remake, but it’s the exception rather than the rule.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I am glad when a good remake comes along, but usually most remakes are pretty bad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jordan Dodd said:
I remember seeing the remake of this and really liking the concept. I can’t remember if it was a bad remake or not, at the time I didn’t know it was a remake. But I remember the core concept…. this is another one I’ll have to add to the list!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I’ve heard the remake is pretty bad so I’m steering clear. But this film was very chilling and unusual.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jordan Dodd said:
Yeah I can’t remember the remake’s quality at all, I just remember the core concept. The only scene I remember was a man using his wife as an ATM machine, haha. The rest is lost in my memory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It’s probably best that you don’t remember the remake that well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
michael9murray said:
And what a chilling ending!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I know, it’s still in my head now.
LikeLike
Pingback: Lights Out As “The Attic’s” Virtual Reality Convention Comes to An End | In My Cluttered Attic
Paul S said:
I saw the remake on television last week, now I want to check out the original. Nice review my friend!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
This version is vastly superior to the remake Paul. It’s so genuinely creepy yet has a satirical bite.
LikeLike