Tags
1960's, Angela Lansbury, Frank Sinatra, James Gregory, Janet Leigh, John Frankenheimer, Laurence Harvey, The Manchurian Candidate, Thriller
Film Title
The Manchurian Candidate
Director
John Frankenheimer
Starring
- Frank Sinatra as Major Bennett Marco
- Laurence Harvey as Raymond Shaw
- Angela Lansbury as Mrs. Eleanor Iselin
- Janet Leigh as Eugenie Rose Chaney
- James Gregory as Senator John Iselin
A most unusual and highly compelling slice of Cold War paranoia and trickery, The Manchurian Candidate still holds intense power today, for its winding plot, direction and acting. With various switches in tone and much food for thought, it’s a movie that definitely burns into the brain with its intricate plot and terrifying notions.
During the Korean War, a platoon of U.S. soldiers, headed by the distant Raymond Shaw and included Captain Bennett Marco, their group is ambushed. After the war, they return to life in America, but something is amiss. For starters, Raymond is given the Medal of Honor, though we later see that he was a loner in his company and that while the men all say that “Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life”, there is something not right about it. The main person who it impacts is Marco, now a captain, who experiences a recurring nightmare of his dazed platoon being observed by Chinese and Russian agents, as a cold Raymond murders two of their members. Delving deeper, Marco comes to realise that the platoon was brainwashed while in captivity, with particular attention lavished upon Raymond. Yet while he has these parts of what looks like an elaborate Communist conspiracy, it’s getting it into some semblance of reality and reason that proves difficult for him to understand. At first not helped by Army Intelligence, when a fellow member of the squad speaks of the same thing, he receives some backing. Marco isn’t going down without a fight, as he rushes to uncover sinister machinations that continue to grow more complex. Meanwhile, Raymond’s mother Eleanor Iselin begins to use her pernicious influence to further her zealous and easily led husband John Iselin’s campaign. She is linked to something dark, but to explain it would be to spoil it. With memories eventually slotting into place, Marco knows that Raymond is unwittingly being commanded and primed to do something terrible. But can Marco put the pieces together before something truly horrifying can take place?
John Frankenheimer crafts this political thriller with a considerable amount of unusual tension, layering events through a dreamlike haze, yet still making it in the realms of reality when it comes to the underhand tactics of power angle. His off kilter approach to such dynamite material is rapid and complex, trusting the audience to pay attention and follow the labyrinthine plot at play. It’s a daring high wire act keeping all the contradicting parts of irony and terror going, but Frankenheimer is up to the task and does it with intelligence. The Manchurian Candidate is a film filled with political manipulations, dastardly ploys for power and the things people are willing to do to gain a foothold in government. While it’s all shot through the eyes of the Cold War, the atmosphere of it is still very apparent and topical today. This suggests that The Manchurian Candidate was a film ahead of its time in what it depicted and how it visualized it. And talking of visuals, the surreal touches and how it bleeds into reality are strikingly evoked. Repeating motifs of Queen of Hearts playing cards, rhyming phrases and unusual tricks are all in there to tease us. A prime example of the effectiveness of The Manchurian Candidate is the dream/flashback of Marco. In it, the camera starts turning and we witness his troops sitting and listening to what seems to be a lecture on plants given by a posh lady. As the camera continues its journey, it cunningly reveals that it is a brainwashing exercise by Communist agents. Such sly precision and the overlapping cuts between the two extremes are marvellously structured and disquieting. Much can also be said about the unnerving close-ups and deep focus, which in black and white, really stay with you. This is a movie that is genuinely unpredictable from scene to scene with its ever-changing tonality. From surreal to hard-hitting, baffling to cynically up front, The Manchurian Candidate keeps you on your toes with its intricacies and corkscrew plot. Twisting and turning away is the order of the day and with unusual and intentionally mysterious parts that are scattered in there, it is a brain teaser of the highest order. One can definitely say that this is a movie that is rewarding on repeat viewings, as you’re bound to discover something you hadn’t thought of the first time. Certain areas like the unusual scene between Marco and a mysterious woman named Eugenie where they communicate almost in code, are kept ambiguous and esoteric, ensuring your rapt attention and providing the overall feeling of a complex puzzle box that the film greatly projects. If ever there was a movie that provoked thoughts, it was The Manchurian Candidate. As for the music, it has a slowly percolating menace to it that strums away in the background and uses haunting repetition to enhance the feeling of hypnosis.
A simply marvellous cast of actors flesh out this shocking and impactful movie. Frank Sinatra leads the way, projecting a tormented yet determined manner as the crusading Major. Playing against his usual persona of cool and suave, Sinatra finds an exemplary change of pace that shows of his dramatic muscles. Often times, we are perplexed as he is in all this conspiracy and web-spinning, but his unwavering desire and desperation is what truly makes Sinatra ideal in this role. Laurence Harvey’s detached and remote demeanor fit perfectly with his character of Raymond, who is brainwashed into a remorseless killer for sinister purposes. Yet Harvey finds real moments of pathos and sympathy beneath the aloofness, contributing a tragic layer to the character. Yet it’s Angela Lansbury who is the person you remember most for her startling performance as the mother from hell. At first seeming to be just overly smothering, slowly and subtly her power crazed motives and single-minded persistence come through in chilling effect. Mrs. Eleanor Iselin is a master manipulator who pulls the strings of everyone, delivered with gusto and alarming coldness by the great Lansbury. Angela Lansbury formidably plays this woman as a shocking, monstrous and calculating harridan, insistent on getting what she wants and doing everything it takes to get it. For those who mainly think of Lansbury for her motherly and sweet roles, her performance here should make you re-asses that due to its jaw dropping impact and delicious evil. Janet Leigh appears as a most enigmatic lady, who you aren’t sure what to make of. Her scenes with Sinatra have a most unusual and eerie feeling as they raise so many questions, which is part of the beauty of it. James Gregory aces it as the buffoon and bombastic Senator, manipulated like a marionette by his wife for her own gain.
Menacingly suspenseful, darkly cynical and still timely after all these years, The Manchurian Candidate is a classic piece of mounting psychological tension and political satire That triumphs, complete with supreme direction and excellent acting.
Laura Beth said:
Excellent review. I thought the remake with Denzel Washington was interesting, but not nearly as good as the original.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vinnieh said:
I have not actually seen the remake, but I think it would be hard to match up to this film. It just has so much going for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Laura Beth said:
I agree. I’ve seen both, but the original is top-notch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Most originals are.
LikeLike
Paul S said:
Angela Lansbury gives my 2nd favourite female performance of all time in this film. She is wonderful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
She is simply outstanding. Her character is unforgettable for her power mad plots and manipulative mind. I could feel myself getting very frightened just by how alarmingly chilling she was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MoJo said:
Now I have to know what your first favorite is. Faye Dunaway in Mommie Dearest? Oprah Winfrey in The Color Purple? Meryl Streep in The Devil Wears Prada? Lea Thompson in Howard the Duck? If it’s the last one, lie to me. Please. 🦆 🦆 🦆 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Got to go with Meryl Streep, she rocks.
LikeLike
MoJo said:
YES!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I love Meryl Streep anyway, she’s a versatile and true professional.
LikeLike
MoJo said:
Agree!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
She never lets me down.
LikeLike
By Hook Or By Book ~ Book Reviews, News, & Other Stuff said:
I agree with Laura Beth. The remake is quite good, but even though it had Denzel, there’s no way it could have lived up to this brilliant classic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vinnieh said:
It’s difficult to live up to a classic. This had so many ingredients in it to make it still effective. And you were right about Angela Lansbury, she was formidable and startling as the mother from hell.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Buffy Devane said:
Spot on… this movie really made me reevaluate both Sinatra and Lansbury as very effective actors… and indeed, this is a film that really benefitted atmospherically from being in black & white.
A Cold War thriller that’s both heartbreaking (the bits with the rival senator and his daughter) and truly chilling — and I can imagine even more so following the JFK assassination the year after its release.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
The black and white added another layer of intrigue to it, colour would have ruined it. Yes, given what happened a year later, the mystery abounds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MoJo said:
I agree with the others. The remake was good but it was such a daunting task to take on. The same happened when they remade Sabrina, Mister Roberts, and Carrie – all epic in completely different ways. There are some movies that just have something that can’t be redone. You have to take something with endless opportunities like Power Rangers and jazz it up. You have nothing to lose there. (I know. It seems out of place in this comment thread but it is one of the few remakes that actually knocked it out of the park. I would have preferred to be tied to a bed of ants before watching two hours of the actually original show. 😉). Fantastic review of this movie. It was such a goodie.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vinnieh said:
I really dig it as a movie. So unusual and compelling with what it presented. There are only some times when remakes work, other times they largely flop.
LikeLike
MoJo said:
I have been trying to think of a really stellar remake and (beyond Power Rangers – although that’s not really a remake) I can’t think of any at the moment. Maybe you could say the Batman series but those were more side stories than remakes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It’s difficult to really think of one.
LikeLike
MoJo said:
Yep
LikeLiked by 1 person
Elizabeth said:
The most interesting thing for me in the movie is the premise that a person can be created to carry out someone else’s plans. When Robert Kennedy was assassinated, there was talk that Sirhan Sirhan was a “Manchurian candidate” creation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It’s a terrifying idea when you think about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
J. said:
Great review. Haven’t seen this one in a while, but Sinatra was brilliant. I saw the remake a few years ago, which wasn’t terrible, but just didn’t really do an awfy lot for me. Guess it was the lack of Sinatra.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I liked seeing Sinatra playing against type effectively, you could feel his nervousness and terror at the situation.
LikeLike
fragglerocking said:
OK gonna have to see this!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
You simply must.
LikeLiked by 1 person
raistlin0903 said:
That’s what I always like about you, you get a recommendation for a movie, and you watch it almost immediately. It really was an amazing piece of cinema this one. Lansburry’s role was terrific and one of the main reasons this movie worked so well, but honestly the entire movie was great. As far as remakes go, I have to admit that the remake with Denzel certainly wasn’t bad either. But this was just sooo much better. Glad you enjoyed the movie, and ofcourse thanks for yet another amazing review 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I think it’s only right to watch what people recommend. The entire movie was something most peculiar and enthralling. The way it managed to incorporate so much and still be riveting says a lot about the talent involved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
alexraphael said:
Astonishing movie. Your review does it justice. My first experience of Angela Lansbury was as the sweet old detective in Murder She Wrote so I was truly astounded.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I was truly astounded too. Couldn’t believe she could play evil so well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
beetleypete said:
Good review mate. You make the point well that the film still has modern-day impact, and it is also much better than the later remake.
Cheers, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It has a lot to say about political manipulation and the craziness of power. What a cast too, especially Lansbury who was chilling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sophie @ Blame Chocolate said:
Cold War movies and literature still manage to fascinate me. It was a complex time and the perfect setting for complex pieces. The manipulation, deceit and suspense in this sound perfectly orchestrated and executed. I have never watched a Frank Sinatra movie before, but I’ll definitely keep this one on my watchlist.
Wonderful review, Vinnie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Yes, the palpable tension is there to see. You can clearly witness the quiet and not spoken about terror that many were feeling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Three Rows Back said:
Fine work buddy; we are obviously on the same page. Still timely as you say; especially with the Trump/Russia fiasco!
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
Yes, given current events, it’s unusual topical and timely.
LikeLike
Computer said:
Lansburry’s role was terrific and one of the main reasons this movie worked so well, but honestly the entire movie was great. The way it managed to incorporate so much and still be riveting says a lot about the talent involved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
I very much appreciate your comment. This movie had so much to offer and stands out even now.
LikeLike
leroyjhunt said:
I liked seeing Sinatra playing against type effectively, you could feel his nervousness and terror at the situation. Yes, given current events, it’s unusual topical and timely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
His nervousness and horror where telegraphed extremely well. Strange that I should see this film now and it being so timely.
LikeLike
Web Development said:
I liked seeing Sinatra playing against type effectively, you could feel his nervousness and terror at the situation. Strange that I should see this film now and it being so timely.
LikeLike
vinnieh said:
Sinatra did a fine job going against his usual image.
LikeLike
Tom Austin said:
I really enjoyed watching this film. Sinatra was not the Sinatra would expect to see. He was a victim. He was a victim of his mother. I think the performance of Sinatra and Landsbury give this film its staying power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vinnieh said:
It’s got so much going for it as a movie. Paranoia, uneasiness and conspiracy.
LikeLike