Tags
2010's, Bruce Willis, Christopher Lloyd, Christopher Meloni, Crime, Dennis Haysbert, Eva Green, Frank Miller, Jaime King, Jamie Chung, Jeremy Piven, Jessica Alba, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Josh Brolin, Juno Temple, Lady Gaga, Mickey Rourke, Powers Boothe, Ray Liotta, Robert Rodriguez, Rosario Dawson, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For
Film Title
Sin City: A Dame to Kill For
Directors
Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez
Starring
- Mickey Rourke as Marv
- Jessica Alba as Nancy Callahan
- Josh Brolin as Dwight McCarthy
- Eva Green as Ava Lord
- Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Johnny
- Powers Boothe as Senator Roark
- Rosario Dawson as Gail
- Dennis Haysbert as Manute
- Ray Liotta as Joey
- Bruce Willis as Hartigan
- Jamie Chung as Miho
- Jaime King as Goldie/Wendy
- Jeremy Piven as Bob
- Christopher Meloni as Mort
- Christopher Lloyd as Kroenig
- Juno Temple as Sally
- Lady Gaga as Bertha
Coming almost ten years after the startling original Sin City, this second installment had a lot to live up to. Unfortunately, it doesn’t match its predecessor in many ways, but A Dame to Kill For is far from an all-out failure and does have its moments that need praise.
A Dame to Kill For takes the same narrative structure of the first movie, albeit with stories that serve as a prequel to those events that occurred in the original. These stories intertwine at many points along the way of the narrative structure. We first of all have cocky slicker Johnny, who seems to have a lot of luck when it comes to winning in poker games. Arriving in the godforsaken town of the title, he takes on the corrupt Senator Roark in a game that he repeatedly wins. Roark doesn’t take to kindly to this showing of power from the young gambler and has his men violently sort him out. This in turn sets up many more brutal encounters between the two men in a battle of supremacy. The second story and prequel to the first movie, concerns Dwight McCarthy when he was a private detective, intent on not letting violent urges and temptation get in his way. Dwight finds himself caught in a seductive web, spun by the femme fatale Ava Lord. No matter how hard he tries to resist her, he can’t break the spell of the poisonous temptress.
She brings him into a plot to kill her husband, by playing the part of the abused wife who needs protecting. Sure enough, the bewitched Dwight agrees and murders her unwitting husband. With her husband dispatched of, the cunning Ava leaves Dwight for dead. Good for Dwight is the fact that he has the brute Marv to help him and take him to the girls of Old Town, lead once again by the kick ass dominatrix Gail. The hookers shelter him and help him through reconstructive surgery alter his appearance, ready for revenge upon the eponymous dame for her betrayal. The last tale focuses on Nancy Callahan, who mourns the death of her protector Hartigan. Knowing that the reason he killed himself was because of the evil Roark, the exotic dancer slips into drunken madness and uncontrollable rage; plagued by hallucinations of Hartigan that warn her not to avenge him. Swearing revenge on the all-powerful Senator, she teams with a willing Marv in her attempt to kill the corrupt leader once and for all.
Visual style is very much on display throughout A Dame to Kill For, it’s just at times it doesn’t feel as fresh as it did in the first film. We do get some nifty visuals mind you( the sinister crimson of Ava’s lips and shining emerald eyes are a particular highlight) and the use of silhouettes is stunning to accentuate the smoky atmosphere of the town. There’s just a feeling of ‘been there done that’ about it that hangs over this movie. Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez both bring style and action to the fray, but the structure isn’t as up to scratch as it once was and the movie suffers as a result. For example, certain parts of the stories are expanded upon enough and other times too much time is spent on one tale. Yet when the action does hit its height, it does deliver in blood-soaked fashion that is still quite electrifying. Once again, a sexy soundtrack that hark back to the shadows of Noir creates a good amount of intensity that provides interest.
Mickey Rourke once again delivers the goods as the brutish Marv, who is more than willing to help out a friend with business, especially if it involves blood, murder and violence. Rourke does get to show a tender side again, this time acting as the helper to the vengeful Nancy in her time of need. Jessica Alba, though often the subject of debate as to her acting credentials, confounds expectations and brings sadness and aggression to the role of Nancy. Rather than just the sexy dancer from the first film, we get to see her as a broken down girl, shorn of hope but thirsty for revenge. Josh Brolin, portraying the character of Dwight before the reconstruction sported in the first movie, gives his part weariness as he navigates his way through violence, yet finds himself ensnared by the manipulative Ava. Eva Green is the definite showstopper in this movie, seductive and sinuous as she traps men with her beauty and brings pain to them.
Slinky and cunning, she is a poisonous viper who is adept at making people do her dirty work and then leaving them with the consequences. To say that Eva Green was smouldering and sexy in this movie would be a criminal understatement. Joseph Gordon-Levitt contributes youthful charm and cocky self-assurance as upstart Johnny, who tangles with the wrong man in the form of Senator Roark and pays the price. Power Boothe returning again brings malevolent sneakiness to Roark and exposes his ruthless, power-mad nature that knows no bounds once infuriated by others. Rosario Dawson, although unfortunately used in a reduced capacity, is still fierce and crafty as Gail. Dennis Haysbert has the physical stature and deep voice to make Manute a very physical and dangerous adversary, yet Ray Liotta in a role as another corrupt politician is somewhat wasted. The same can be said about Bruce Willis, who appears as Hartigan in Nancy’s hallucinations. He just isn’t given enough to do to make his appearance here memorable. Jamie Chung doesn’t make for a great replacement as assassin Miho; I believe Devon Aoki did a better job and had the stony faced intensity for the part which Chung lacks. Jaime King returns as twin prostitutes Wendy and Goldie, but scarcely makes an impact this time around. Jeremy Piven and Christopher Meloni make impressions as two cops investigating the murder of Ava’s husband; Piven is the one who is wary of the dame, whereas Meloni is the one who falls under the siren’s spell. Christopher Lloyd gives his part as a sinister doctor who helps Johnny after he is brutalised by Roark’s men.
Juno Temple is wasted as a young prostitute saved by Dwight, while music fans should look out for a cameo by pop star Lady Gaga as a sympathetic waitress who takes pity on a wounded Johnny.
Sin City: A Dame to Kill For was never going to match the heights of the original movie, but it’s not as bad as people make out. It’s just not as thrilling as it could have been, despite its wealth of potential.
I thought the first one was really good. Having never read the graphic novels, I saw it as Film Noir for the new century. I will definitely give this second film a go, even though sequels can often be predictable and less exciting. (Exceptions of course, Godfather ll for example)
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Pete, a second viewing is always interesting.
LikeLike
I hope this pops up on Netflix soon. I am a massive Sin City fan and even if it is a poor sequel, it still hits all the right notes for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems you enjoyed it a bit more than I did. It still had merit to it though. If you wanna read my thoughts on the first movie, you can find it on the link in this review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still need to see this thing… good post, Vinnie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Eric, it’s not as good as the first one, but it has its moments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good review Vinnie. Not great, but only made okay by the ensemble.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks mate, yeah most of the cast made this movie at least worth watching.
LikeLike
I did love the first one, but I really had no intention of watching this one. But your review has made me want to see it now. You keep doing that to me. Stahp!!! I have enough to watch as it is!! :-p
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks sister, I can’t help it! I try to make my reviews as interesting as possible. It’s not in the same league as the original, but there are parts that work in this quite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s also the fact that JGL plays in it… meow…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh, you naughty girl. I was concentrating more on the sexy Eva Green.
LikeLike
Oh yes, her too. She’s quite stunning. I’d add just a few more pounds to her, though. I like my women curvy, hehe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too many subplots for me and none of them as engaging as those seen in the original. Telltale Games should make a series out of Sin City, though. In fact they probably already have. Just googled it, they have not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You do have a point there, the structure could have been a lot better in this movie.
LikeLike
Dayum you get back to comments quick! Normally takes me days. Is blogging like your job now? Noticed you’ve picked up in posts and followers and stuff recently, going really strong 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve often been complimented on my ability to reply to comments quite quickly. Yeah, my blog is going really strong at the moment, it just passed the three year mark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So I just saw as I scrolled down my Read-Feed. Congrats! I need to step mine up, posting has gone down from three a week to one a month. Shocking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the positive feedback. You go at your own pace, the blogosphere will always be here.
LikeLike
I’m with you on the Sin City Telltale game!! That would be pretty damned awesome
LikeLiked by 1 person
It certainly would be very good.
LikeLike
The thought never crossed my mind before, but a Telltale Sin City game could be incredible! Shame the franchise’s name is dirt in Hollywood at the moment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be very good to see in the future, wouldn’t it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful review Vinnie! I loved the first one but somehow I missed that they came out with a sequel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting, this doesn’t compare to the first film, but it’s not as bad as some people make out. I must sign off now, my peach ass needs sleep. Talk to you tomorrow.
LikeLike
PALS Forever!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely, peachy all the way.
LikeLike
It’s definitely inferior to the first film, though I think having Eva Green as femme fatale is spot-on casting. I was pretty bored throughout the movie though, which is never a good sign.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Casting Eva Green in the femme fatale role was indeed amazing, but as you say, this movie just can’t live up to the first.
LikeLike
I haven’t given into this one just yet because I know I’ll just be disappointed. I do like Eva Green, though, so maybe eventually lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not as bad as some people make out, it just doesn’t quite have the compelling nature that the original had.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’re in the same boat here Vinnie. It’s not as god-awful as some people have made it out to be but definitely a bit of a comedown from the awesomeness that was the original. Nice work as per usual bud.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Tom, yeah it wasn’t as bad as many people were making it out to be. It had its moments, just didn’t add up to an excellent movie in the end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel like it does have some good points, which you pointed out, but I did not like it. The most distracting for me was trying to discern the timeline in reference to the first movie. At times it was a sequel and then it was a prequel if we try and match the events up with the first one. Did you find the timeline confusing and asynchronous? Overall, the storyline was lacklustre in comparison to the original but could be appreciated if you look at it as it’s own entity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, I did get a bit confused with the jumping around in time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was not a fan of this at all, I liked a few moments here and there but it all fell flat for me. I initially thought that the style had just worn out its welcome, but I re-watched the first one afterwards and it still works where this one doesn’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The first one just has such brutal memorability that this movie sadly lacks.
LikeLike
I couldn’t believe how little colour this had compared to the first. The first also felt more surreal (a dude who collects heads(!!), bruce willis’ jail cell suroundeded by… nothing) where the second one lost this element. Taratino was involved in the first one, I wonder if that was the difference?
Gordon-Levitt though was awesome and by far the best part of the movie for me. Dude can fucking act
LikeLiked by 1 person
The first one did have that surreal feel to it, now you mention it. This one just sadly fell a little flat in comparison. Gordon-Levitt was definitely a highlight though, with that cocky swagger.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah I love him in almost anything he does. Mysterious Skin is one of my favourites, but I really enjoyed Don Jon, and I usually hate romantic comedies!!
But yeah this sequel didn’t have that otherwordly feel to it… not as much colour to contrast against the B&W and a much more grounded world, wheras the first had intense colours and felt like a trip into another dimension, it felt like I was in a graphic novel. This sequel just doesn’t come close to that for me unfortunetely.
I wonder if Tarantino was a factor in these massive differences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You might have a bit of a point there regarding Tarantino.
LikeLike
Don’t you think he’s just too smug though? Gordon-Levitt. I find him so smug but not even sure why! He was so cute and gawky when he was younger. I get the impression if you asked him for an autograph now he’d tell you to fuck off.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think in this movie he is smug, but it’s the character he’s portraying. I don’t know about him in real life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No I don’t know either, it’s just a feeling I get. I want to punch him sometimes. But he is a great actor, agreed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’re all entitled to our opinions Emma. He seems to be a big hit with the ladies I know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry for swearing in that past comment too, force of habit – please feel free to delete it!
He is handsome. I just think he takes himself too seriously. I’m literally basing that on NOTHING lol so don’t pay any attention. And he is a good, serious actor so kudos to him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t apologise for swearing, we’re all adults here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, but still, it’s your blog I shouldn’t be crude!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m always crude on your blog so feel free to be as raunchy as you like on here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point, Sir! Hahahaha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s me, always getting to the point of the matter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh hello matron!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ding Dong dear, my peachy ass is in need of a little attention, hehe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You love bums!!!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not the ass master for nothing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very true!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anyway, you can’t beat a nice shapely ass.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well you can….but not too hard!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh, you like something you can grab then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol I don’t mind really 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re into a bit of variety then Emma.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vinster!!!!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, I knew that would get a reaction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You did!!!!!! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I often worry when I send these comments that someone going past your computer is gonna think I’m a creep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No-one would think that and quite frankly who cares if they do!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for that encouragement, but it does make me wonder if you have a boyfriend what he must think of some of the raunchy comments we exchange.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do have a boyfriend and he occasionally frequents WordPress! I have nothing to hide from him, he knows my silly nature.
So don’t you worry mister!!!! (and he’s NOT built like The Rock or anything…haha!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh that’s good, didn’t want him thinking I’m some strange sexually charged devil or something. Glad to hear he isn’t built like the Rock, that’s really reassuring.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please don’t worry 🙂
And you’re certainly not strange OR a devil! Sexually charged……yes. Lol 🙂
Defo not The Rock!
LikeLiked by 1 person
All worries are gone sister, did you say your boyfriend uses WordPress, does he have a blog?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes but you’re not asking him about his peachy (hairy) bottom!!!!!!! Haha! He likes video games, he started a blog for video games but doesn’t have our staying power haha 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point there Emma, peachy hairy bottom hehe.
LikeLike
Oh yeah I suppose peaches are a bit fuzzy!! Lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hehe, what would your man think discussing his hairy ass on here?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I dunno, I don’t follow what celebrities are doing personally, and I don’t thing i could judge such a thing from only his acting. I can’t really disagree with you though as I wouldn’t know!! My exposure to pop-culture is erratic at the best of times, I haven’t seen a single interview with him or anything like that.You could be right
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh well not to worry Jordan, I was only being tongue-in-cheek anyway 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
hehe no fair I’m too blond and too gullible!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
No you’re not!!!!!!! I am though! Hahahaha 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I most certainly am, I fell for two April fools joke this year. I’m terrible!
LikeLiked by 2 people
What were they?!!!!
I’m a bit like that actually. It’s nice though isn’t it! I mean, who wants to be a cynic. If you’re told something amazing….it’s so much better to have wide eyes of wonder!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well said, very true.
One was Tom’s April 1st post at DSR (tho when I read it it was April 2nd down under!!). The other was Ruth @ Flixchatter. Two massive fails within hours of each other!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha! I bet you felt a right plum! But I still stand by what I said 🙂 🙂 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haven’t heard the word plum in ages, haha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yay!!! Haha 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does carry certain connotations though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fell for Tom’s one as well buddy.
LikeLike
We all fool for some of them at least once in our lifetime.
LikeLike
You are definitely not gullible sister.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks brother you got my back 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I most certainly do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ditto 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure you’re not gullible dude.
LikeLike
I did not have the pleasure of watching this one yet. I love the way you describe the characters and still manage to bring the best out of this film, even though it wasn’t as good as the first film. I love Eva Green, just thought I should mention that. Great review, Sir Vinnie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheers Reut. I try and find merit in most things, even if it’s hard.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I know what you mean. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice review, very fair! It’s not the worst film by any stretch and enjoyable, but it still seems slightly insulting when compared to the first which I LOVE. I just think it’s a bit cheap! The effects looks cheap, the black and white stuff (sorry I’m no good at explaining things like this!!) looks cartoonish compared to the first film and the stories weren’t as engaging. But having said that, everything you said was quite true and fair.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you agree with my thoughts Emma, I don’t think anything could really compare with the original.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s true and I prefer to see the good in things as well. I just think I was disappointed (I was even disappointed when I watched the trailer!) as I love Rodriguez and I love Sin City.
I expect it’s our love of the first movie, rather than a hatred for this movie that brings it down slightly. And as Melissa said, as a stand alone film it’s pretty decent still!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Completely understand what you mean.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great minds 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can’t argue there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yours is probably a bit better than mine though 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wouldn’t be so certain Emma.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m an idiot and you’re a genius!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are not an idiot Emma, by any stretch of the imagination.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Vinnie 🙂 just a bit silly when I drink too much lemon squash?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good old lemon squash.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Robinsons?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Classic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know it!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neat review. So much to talk about. I should try and see this. Hey I managed to avoid talking about Eva Green. No wait…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, it can be really hard not to talk about Miss Green.
LikeLike
This one killed me with its badness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It definitely has experienced a mixed reaction from a lot of people.
LikeLike
I really liked the first but haven’t seen the second. I didn’t realise it was a prequel so thanks for the tip.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting Richard, only parts of it are prequel. The rest is a definite sequel. This doesn’t compare with the first, but it has it’s moments.
LikeLike
Still sounded good and that’s the main thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hope you like it if you do see it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked this a bit more than you, Vinnie, but glad to see people assessing it more positively than the reception it received in cinemas — it’s not that bad. Also, I re-watched the first film the night before and didn’t like it as much as I remembered (not helped by it being the messy extended version, I suspect), so that may have thrown my perception.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, it’s not as bad as people made it out to be. Thanks for all the comments mate, have you checked out some of my Ladies posts or naughtier posts? They’ve been very well received.
LikeLike
I haven’t, actually. Must look into those!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can find them in my movie opinions and thoughts category.
LikeLike
I think I may still have to give this one a watch. I did originally plan to see it, but time got away from me and since most of the reviews were negative I decided to give it a miss. Cool review yo. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting mate.
LikeLike
Excellent review. I’m not surprised this movie doesn’t live up to the original. Movies rarely do nowadays. I need to start watching movies again :]. I might start with this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think because the original was so amazing and innovative, anything that followed wouldn’t match it.
LikeLike
Given some of the fanboy vitriol I’ve seen heaped at the movie, it’s really refreshing to read a more measured review. Yet to see it, but this makes me think it won’t be a total waste of time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As I’ve said to other people, it doesn’t quite measure up to the first but it isn’t the worst film ever as some would have you believe.
LikeLike
I have nominated you for The Dragon’s Loyalty Award.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks mate, really appreciate the nomination.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love the styling and there are some fun performances but this definitely isn’t a patch on the first one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally agree with you there Laura.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vinnie, I recently purchased this film, and was disappointed on my first viewing. But I’ve learned to distrust my first impressions. So I watched it again the next evening, asking myself along the way, “Okay, what is it here you don’t like?” I discovered that I really liked this film after all. Each and every scene is well constructed and photographed. For some reason, this eluded me the first time around. The story lines do precede and follow events in the original film, but with careful viewing, the true chronology can be discerned. I agree with one of your followers here that color was used less often as a contrast with the black and white photography, but think perhaps that was a strategy. In the first film, every bit of color was a visual draw due to the novelty of the technique. But now, all these years later, knowing that the audience would be somewhat jaded by this technique, the director may have decided to use color more sparingly in order to draw more attention to it.
The other observation I would like to make here is that while certain actors did not return for this second film, the director did a good job selecting actors to fill their shoes. Dennis Haysbert (Manute) looked very much like Michael Clarke Duncan.in this film, and even his voice was uncannily similar. I’ll disagree with you here and say that I slightly prefer Jamie Chung (Miho) over Devon Aoki. The physical resemblance was not quite as convincing, but was close enough not to distract. I much prefer Clive Owen (Dwight) over Josh Brolin. The reconstructive surgery at least tried to address the discrepancy in physical appearance, and I give the result a pass.
Finally, I would submit that Sin City: A Dame to Kill For succeeds in wrapping up plot points from the first film (especially in terms of Senator Roark), and that it therefore is a necessary companion piece. I would encourage anyone who watched this film and was disappointed by it to give it a second shot. To view it only once would be a…sin!
As a post scriptum, I would like to point out that the city’s name is actually Basin City, and seem to recall that the first two letters (Ba) in the city’s welcome sign were spray painted by vandals in the first film, thereby creating the nickname. By the way, I live in Las Vegas, Nevada, which is often referred to as Sin City!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the highly detailed comment, I look forward to seeing you around my blog in the future.
LikeLike